Editorial Standards

How CryptoSignals publishes and corrects content

This policy governs public guides, methodology pages, and material product claims on the official CryptoSignals website.

By CryptoSignals Editorial DeskReviewed by CryptoSignals Editorial Desk5 min read
  • Named authorship and human accountability
  • Primary or authoritative sources where practical
  • Visible material corrections and update dates

Authorship and review

Each substantive page identifies an author or responsible editorial desk and a reviewer when appropriate. Human reviewers remain accountable for published content even when software or AI assists research, drafting, translation, or quality checks.

Evidence and claims

Factual claims should use authoritative sources or clearly identified first-party product information. Performance language must link to the measurement rules and must not imply that past outcomes guarantee future results.

Conflicts and commercial context

CryptoSignals sells premium access and optional automation. Editorial pages may explain those products, but commercial interest does not replace evidence. Exchange referrals or material relationships should be disclosed where they influence a recommendation.

Updates and corrections

Pages show an updated date when their substance changes. Material factual errors are corrected promptly and the revised wording should not erase the context needed to understand the original claim. Minor spelling or formatting changes do not require a correction notice.

Related playbooks

CryptoSignals

VIP signals, free Telegram proof, and premium execution support through @CsSubscriptionsBot.

Editorial Policy | CryptoSignals